Advertisement
COST vs LMFA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a StrongBuy and LMFA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLMFA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LMFA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMFA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LMFA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while LMFA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
COST is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2025.
LMFA is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Discount Stores (+0.68% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.26% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| COST | LMFA | COST / LMFA | |
| Capitalization | 447B | 8.4M | 5,320,795% |
| EBITDA | 12.6B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.331 | -22.558 | -46% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.87 | 2.05 | 2,872% |
| Revenue | 264B | -5.67M | -4,659,310% |
| Total Cash | 13.2B | 469K | 2,814,499% |
| Total Debt | 8.04B | 285K | 2,820,702% |
COST | LMFA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMFA's Valuation (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LMFA’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMFA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
COST's SMR Rating (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMFA (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LMFA (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
COST's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMFA (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
| COST | LMFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
LMFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMFA has been loosely correlated with SOFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMFA jumps, then SOFI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMFA | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| SOFI - LMFA | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| SYF - LMFA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| URI - LMFA | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| ENVA - LMFA | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| COF - LMFA | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||