Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FTDS
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs FTDS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$56.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.30%)
Volume$3.59K
Net Assets21B
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$53.74
Change+$0.23 (+0.43%)
Volume$300
Net Assets26.55M
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FTDS commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Buy and FTDS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 21B vs. FTDS (26.5M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FTDS (6.731) vs COWZ (0.827). COWZ was incepted earlier than FTDS: COWZ (9 years) vs FTDS (19 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover COWZ (77.00) vs COWZ (77.00).
| COWZ | FTDS | COWZ / FTDS | |
| Gain YTD | 0.827 | 6.731 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 21B | 26.5M | 79,245% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.70 | 70% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 104.00 | 74% |
| Yield | 1.59 | 1.91 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FTDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 81% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| MAS - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| EWBC - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||