Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FTDS
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs FTDS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$54.50
Change+$0.59 (+1.09%)
Volume$2.34M
Net Assets20.76B
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$51.45
Change+$0.54 (+1.06%)
Volume$4.02K
Net Assets28.01M
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FTDS commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a StrongBuy and FTDS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.8B vs. FTDS (28M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FTDS (2.228) vs COWZ (-2.811). COWZ was incepted earlier than FTDS: COWZ (8 years) vs FTDS (19 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover COWZ (77.00) vs COWZ (77.00).
| COWZ | FTDS | COWZ / FTDS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.811 | 2.228 | -126% |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 28M | 74,286% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.70 | 70% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 104.00 | 74% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 2.09 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +1.09% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 81% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| HAL - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| EWBC - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||