Ad is loading...
COWZ vs HCOW
COWZ vs HCOW Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs HCOW
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$52.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.36K
Net Assets20.83B
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Price$22.16
Change-$0.18 (-0.81%)
Volume$100
Net Assets9.92M
COWZ vs HCOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. HCOW commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Buy and HCOW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.8B vs. HCOW (9.93M). COWZ has a higher annual dividend yield than HCOW: COWZ (-6.413) vs HCOW (-9.664). COWZ was incepted earlier than HCOW: COWZ (8 years) vs HCOW (2 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than HCOW (0.65). COWZ has a higher turnover HCOW (0.00) vs HCOW (0.00).
| COWZ | HCOW | COWZ / HCOW | |
| Gain YTD | -6.413 | -9.664 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 9.93M | 209,572% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.65 | 75% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.95 | 9.90 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| HAL - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +4.55% | ||
More | ||||
HCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCOW has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCOW jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCOW | 100% | +1.50% | ||
| HAL - HCOW | 79% Closely correlated | +4.55% | ||
| SLB - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| MGY - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | +4.84% | ||
| TXT - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| MTDR - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | +6.57% | ||
More | ||||