Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs HCOW
COWZ vs HCOW Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs HCOW
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$54.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$6.13K
Net Assets20.61B
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Price$22.67
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
Volume$200
Net Assets11.55M
COWZ vs HCOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. HCOW commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and HCOW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.6B vs. HCOW (11.5M). COWZ has a higher annual dividend yield than HCOW: COWZ (-2.811) vs HCOW (-7.272). COWZ was incepted earlier than HCOW: COWZ (9 years) vs HCOW (2 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than HCOW (0.65).
| COWZ | HCOW | COWZ / HCOW | |
| Gain YTD | -2.811 | -7.272 | 39% |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 11.5M | 179,130% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.65 | 75% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 1.89 | 10.02 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 23 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| MAS - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
HCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCOW has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCOW jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCOW | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| NOV - HCOW | 79% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| TXT - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| SLB - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| HAL - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| MGY - HCOW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||