Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPBFX vs PDBAX
CPBFX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts CPBFX vs PDBAX
Invesco Core Plus Bond R6
Price$9.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$11.93
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.81B
CPBFX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPBFX vs. PDBAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPBFX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. CPBFX (5.33B). CPBFX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: CPBFX (4.96) vs PDBAX (4.39). CPBFX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: CPBFX (13 years) vs PDBAX (30 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CPBFX (0.48). CPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 465.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPBFX: PDBAX (1000) vs CPBFX (1000000). CPBFX (4.68) and PDBAX (4.57) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.08 vs. CPBFX (-2.48).
| CPBFX | PDBAX | CPBFX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.76 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.77 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.412 | 2.769 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.33B | 48.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 4.39 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 4.57 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.07 | 10.88 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.48 | -2.08 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.64 | 17.16 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement