Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPBFX vs PDBZX
CPBFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts CPBFX vs PDBZX
Invesco Core Plus Bond R6
Price$9.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.75B
CPBFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPBFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPBFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. CPBFX (5.32B). CPBFX pays higher dividends than PDBZX: CPBFX (4.96) vs PDBZX (4.65). CPBFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: CPBFX (13 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) and CPBFX (0.48) have similar cost to investors . CPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 465.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPBFX: PDBZX (0) vs CPBFX (1000000). PDBZX (4.59) and CPBFX (4.45) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.47 vs. CPBFX (-3.29).
| CPBFX | PDBZX | CPBFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.50 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.188 | 2.627 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.32B | 48.7B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 4.65 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 4.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.98 | 10.40 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.29 | -1.47 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.14 | 19.72 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement