Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$29.77
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. CPCLX (1.12B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPCLX (2.85) vs DHLSX (2.09). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. DHLSX (1.53). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 57.44 vs. DHLSX (34.47).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.383 | 9.690 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 1.94B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 2.09 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | 1.53 | 702% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.04 | 19.67 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.44 | 34.47 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement