CPF
Price
$37.43
Change
-$0.07 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
963.73M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCF
Price
$21.09
Change
-$0.16 (-0.75%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPF vs FCF

CPF vs FCF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FCF commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Hold and FCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CPF: $37.43 vs. FCF: $21.09)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 135% vs. FCF: 80%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $963.73M vs. FCF: $2.13B
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $963.73M. FCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than CPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CPF and FCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while FCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

FCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($2.13B) has a higher market cap than CPF($964M). FCF has higher P/E ratio than CPF: FCF (12.86) vs CPF (12.04). FCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.779 vs. CPF (22.185). FCF has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. CPF (88.9M). CPF has less debt than FCF: CPF (102M) vs FCF (155M). FCF has higher revenues than CPF: FCF (538M) vs CPF (293M).
CPFFCFCPF / FCF
Capitalization964M2.13B45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.18527.77980%
P/E Ratio12.0412.8694%
Revenue293M538M54%
Total Cash88.9M118M75%
Total Debt102M155M66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FCF: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8391
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3923
SMR RATING
1..100
4442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPF's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (46). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (39). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (44). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (49). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (56). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLON26.402.05
+8.42%
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
HAWX46.020.36
+0.79%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
BST49.570.38
+0.77%
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
UDN18.340.01
+0.05%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bearish
PLTD5.09-0.18
-3.42%
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares

FCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCF
1D Price
Change %
FCF100%
-0.75%
UBSI - FCF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
NWBI - FCF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
STBA - FCF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
PRK - FCF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
CPF - FCF
85%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More