CPF
Price
$31.16
Change
+$0.13 (+0.42%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
48 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$29.29
Change
+$0.35 (+1.21%)
Updated
Dec 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPF vs FFBC

Header iconCPF vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$31.16
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
Volume$183.82K
CapitalizationN/A
First Financial Ban
Price$29.29
Change+$0.35 (+1.21%)
Volume$8.62K
CapitalizationN/A
CPF vs FFBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FFBC commentary
Dec 12, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Buy and FFBC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 12, 2024
Stock price -- (CPF: $31.16 vs. FFBC: $28.94)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 90% vs. FFBC: 101%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $524.15M vs. FFBC: $2.08B
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $524.15M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than CPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPF is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.55% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than CPF($524M). CPF has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: CPF (8.93) vs FFBC (8.15). CPF YTD gains are higher at: 65.488 vs. FFBC (26.609). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. CPF (109M). CPF has less debt than FFBC: CPF (187M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than CPF: FFBC (840M) vs CPF (247M).
CPFFFBCCPF / FFBC
Capitalization524M2.08B25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD65.48826.609246%
P/E Ratio8.938.15110%
Revenue247M840M29%
Total Cash109M213M51%
Total Debt187M1.28B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6562
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5340
SMR RATING
1..100
1812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1323
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (80). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (53). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (18). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (42). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (23). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MALRX24.05N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Instl
ISBAX14.80-0.02
-0.13%
VY® Columbia Contrarian Core A
STNFX51.50-0.15
-0.29%
Allspring Large Cap Growth Inst
TARZX25.75-0.12
-0.46%
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
CNGFX67.34-0.46
-0.68%
American Funds New Economy 529F

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-0.03%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
BUSE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
UCB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
FRME - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More