CPF
Price
$21.48
Change
+$0.09 (+0.42%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
67 days until earnings call
FUNC
Price
$22.24
Change
-$0.05 (-0.22%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPF vs FUNC

Header iconCPF vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$21.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.42%)
Volume$15K
CapitalizationN/A
First United
Price$22.24
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
Volume$3.78K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CPF vs FUNC Comparison Chart

Loading...

CPFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FUNCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
CPF vs. FUNC commentary
May 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Hold and FUNC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CPF: $21.48 vs. FUNC: $22.24)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 53% vs. FUNC: 45%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $524.15M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $524.15M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than CPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPF is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CPF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FUNC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPF($524M) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than CPF: FUNC (10.14) vs CPF (8.93). CPF YTD gains are higher at: 10.688 vs. FUNC (-4.535). CPF has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than CPF: FUNC (112M) vs CPF (187M). CPF has higher revenues than FUNC: CPF (247M) vs FUNC (71.3M).
CPFFUNCCPF / FUNC
Capitalization524M152M345%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.688-4.535-236%
P/E Ratio8.9310.1488%
Revenue247M71.3M346%
Total Cash109M86.9M125%
Total Debt187M112M167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
1844
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
168
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (62). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPF (100). This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (44). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (44). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (16). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FUNCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IOVFX15.660.11
+0.71%
GMO International Opportunistic Val I
SHRAX108.960.50
+0.46%
ClearBridge Growth A
PEQIX31.92N/A
N/A
Pioneer Equity Income A
SUGYX11.83N/A
N/A
Pioneer Global Sustainable Growth Y
NSMVX40.29-0.10
-0.25%
North Star Micro Cap I

CPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPF
1D Price
Change %
CPF100%
+0.42%
ABCB - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
FRME - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
SASR - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
RNST - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BUSE - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been loosely correlated with FLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then FLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.22%
FLIC - FUNC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
OCFC - FUNC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
FMBH - FUNC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
BUSE - FUNC
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
ABCB - FUNC
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More