Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLIX vs NLSAX
CPLIX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CPLIX vs NLSAX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short I
Price$17.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
CPLIX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLIX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLIX is a StrongBuy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. CPLIX (1.06B). CPLIX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: CPLIX (3.70) vs NLSAX (0.00). CPLIX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CPLIX (9 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). CPLIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). CPLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLIX: NLSAX (1000) vs CPLIX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.09 vs. CPLIX (5.72). CPLIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.58 vs. NLSAX (27.28).
| CPLIX | NLSAX | CPLIX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.222 | 3.521 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 7.39B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 8.09 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | 14.71 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.58 | 27.28 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers