Ad is loading...
CPLIX vs NLSAX
CPLIX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CPLIX vs NLSAX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short I
Price$16.38
Change+$0.60 (+3.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets978.46M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.33
Change+$0.53 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.98B
CPLIX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLIX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLIX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.98B vs. CPLIX (978M). CPLIX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: CPLIX (3.89) vs NLSAX (0.00). CPLIX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CPLIX (9 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). CPLIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). CPLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLIX: NLSAX (1000) vs CPLIX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.14 vs. CPLIX (-2.65). CPLIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.22 vs. NLSAX (26.94).
| CPLIX | NLSAX | CPLIX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.593 | -3.575 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 978M | 6.98B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.65 | 1.14 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 4.91 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.22 | 26.94 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...