CPNFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CTMCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CPNFF vs CTMCF

Header iconCPNFF vs CTMCF Comparison
Open Charts CPNFF vs CTMCFBanner chart's image
Euro Sun Mining
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$490
CapitalizationN/A
Canterra Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$802.65K
CapitalizationN/A
CPNFF vs CTMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNFF vs. CTMCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNFF is a Buy and CTMCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CPNFF: $0.03 vs. CTMCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CPNFF and CTMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNFF: 1% vs. CTMCF: 111%
Market capitalization -- CPNFF: $7.88M vs. CTMCF: $7.71M
CPNFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.88M. CTMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CTMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTMCF is a better buy in the long-term than CPNFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CTMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPNFF is a better buy in the short-term than CTMCF.

Price Growth

CPNFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.30% price change this week, while CTMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNFF($7.88M) and CTMCF($7.71M) have the same market capitalization . CPNFF YTD gains are higher at: 17.705 vs. CTMCF (3.687). CTMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.41M vs. CPNFF (-6.3M). CTMCF has more cash in the bank: 792K vs. CPNFF (17.7K). CPNFF (0) and CTMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CPNFFCTMCFCPNFF / CTMCF
Capitalization7.88M7.71M102%
EBITDA-6.3M-1.41M447%
Gain YTD17.7053.687480%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash17.7K792K2%
Total Debt2.31MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPNFF vs CTMCF: Fundamental Ratings
CPNFF
CTMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6957
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTMCF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (86). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (57). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (69). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNFFCTMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTXSX12.65-0.03
-0.24%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets S
VHYAX39.45-0.29
-0.73%
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Adm
EQIDX12.10-0.09
-0.74%
Allspring Emerging Markets Eq Inc Adm
ALVCX25.23-0.20
-0.79%
American Beacon Large Cap Value C
BRKRX13.79-0.40
-2.82%
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq R1

CPNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPNFF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPNFF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNFF
1D Price
Change %
CPNFF100%
-6.43%
ORZCF - CPNFF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
GORIF - CPNFF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GATO - CPNFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
SDRC - CPNFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
NEWP - CPNFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More

CTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMCF and CQRLF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMCF and CQRLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMCF
1D Price
Change %
CTMCF100%
-1.26%
CQRLF - CTMCF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - CTMCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.60%
DGDCF - CTMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+28.13%
CPNFF - CTMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
CNRIF - CTMCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
More