CPNG
Price
$25.40
Change
-$0.39 (-1.51%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
3 days until earnings call
LQDT
Price
$21.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPNG vs LQDT

Header iconCPNG vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts CPNG vs LQDTBanner chart's image
Coupang
Price$25.40
Change-$0.39 (-1.51%)
Volume$6.46M
CapitalizationN/A
Liquidity Services
Price$21.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$67.32K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CPNG vs LQDT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CPNG vs. LQDT commentary
Nov 03, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNG is a Hold and LQDT is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 03, 2024
Stock price -- (CPNG: $25.40 vs. LQDT: $21.58)
Brand notoriety: CPNG and LQDT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNG: 106% vs. LQDT: 71%
Market capitalization -- CPNG: $45.56B vs. LQDT: $659.19M
CPNG [@Internet Retail] is valued at $45.56B. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $659.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.08T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $39.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than CPNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPNG is a better buy in the short-term than LQDT.

Price Growth

CPNG (@Internet Retail) experienced а -1.05% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPNG is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+0.89% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNG($45.6B) has a higher market cap than LQDT($659M). CPNG has higher P/E ratio than LQDT: CPNG (43.79) vs LQDT (34.82). CPNG YTD gains are higher at: 56.887 vs. LQDT (25.392). CPNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 788M vs. LQDT (36.1M). CPNG has more cash in the bank: 5.54B vs. LQDT (137M). LQDT has less debt than CPNG: LQDT (15.4M) vs CPNG (3.72B). CPNG has higher revenues than LQDT: CPNG (27.2B) vs LQDT (336M).
CPNGLQDTCPNG / LQDT
Capitalization45.6B659M6,920%
EBITDA788M36.1M2,183%
Gain YTD56.88725.392224%
P/E Ratio43.7934.82126%
Revenue27.2B336M8,095%
Total Cash5.54B137M4,041%
Total Debt3.72B15.4M24,123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNGLQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSIG27.431.04
+3.94%
BrightSphere Investment Group
TME11.12-0.01
-0.09%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
TRAW4.99-0.05
-0.98%
Traws Pharma Inc
CBAN15.03-0.18
-1.18%
Colony Bankcorp
SR62.51-1.35
-2.11%
Spire

CPNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPNG has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPNG jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNG
1D Price
Change %
CPNG100%
-1.51%
CVNA - CPNG
46%
Loosely correlated
-7.37%
MI - CPNG
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.59%
JTKWY - CPNG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
ZLNDY - CPNG
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
JMIA - CPNG
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More