CPPKF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.04 (-7.41%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
ERMAY
Price
$5.23
Change
-$0.52 (-9.04%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CPPKF vs ERMAY

Header iconCPPKF vs ERMAY Comparison
Open Charts CPPKF vs ERMAYBanner chart's image
FARADAY COPPER
Price$0.50
Change-$0.04 (-7.41%)
Volume$34.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Eramet-SLN
Price$5.23
Change-$0.52 (-9.04%)
Volume$1.32K
CapitalizationN/A
CPPKF vs ERMAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPPKF vs. ERMAY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPPKF is a StrongSell and ERMAY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CPPKF: $0.50 vs. ERMAY: $5.23)
Brand notoriety: CPPKF and ERMAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPPKF: 251% vs. ERMAY: 28%
Market capitalization -- CPPKF: $115.06M vs. ERMAY: $2.41B
CPPKF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $115.06M. ERMAY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPPKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileERMAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ERMAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERMAY is a better buy in the long-term than CPPKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPPKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERMAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPPKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ERMAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERMAY is a better buy in the short-term than CPPKF.

Price Growth

CPPKF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.73% price change this week, while ERMAY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERMAY($2.42B) has a higher market cap than CPPKF($115M). CPPKF YTD gains are higher at: 2.178 vs. ERMAY (-31.599). ERMAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. CPPKF (-11.52M). ERMAY has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. CPPKF (27.8M). CPPKF has less debt than ERMAY: CPPKF (40K) vs ERMAY (2.1B). ERMAY has higher revenues than CPPKF: ERMAY (3.98B) vs CPPKF (0).
CPPKFERMAYCPPKF / ERMAY
Capitalization115M2.42B5%
EBITDA-11.52M418M-3%
Gain YTD2.178-31.599-7%
P/E RatioN/A8.18-
Revenue03.98B-
Total Cash27.8M1.39B2%
Total Debt40K2.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPPKF vs ERMAY: Fundamental Ratings
CPPKF
ERMAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
9796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9520

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERMAY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPPKF (52). This means that ERMAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPPKF’s over the last 12 months.

CPPKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERMAY (100). This means that CPPKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

ERMAY's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPKF (97). This means that ERMAY’s stock grew similarly to CPPKF’s over the last 12 months.

CPPKF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as ERMAY (63). This means that CPPKF’s stock grew similarly to ERMAY’s over the last 12 months.

ERMAY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPPKF (100). This means that ERMAY’s stock grew significantly faster than CPPKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPPKFERMAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERMAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHISX64.07N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Svc
DWOAX20.69N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Research Growth A
FCGEX19.38-0.48
-2.42%
NYLI PineStone Global Equity Class A
MMSCX10.84-0.46
-4.07%
Praxis Small Cap Index A
IIRSX14.16-0.65
-4.39%
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port I

CPPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPPKF and SCCO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPPKF and SCCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPPKF
1D Price
Change %
CPPKF100%
-7.93%
SCCO - CPPKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
FCX - CPPKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
ERMAY - CPPKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.04%
BCMRF - CPPKF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - CPPKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ERMAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERMAY has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERMAY jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERMAY
1D Price
Change %
ERMAY100%
-9.04%
HBM - ERMAY
43%
Loosely correlated
-6.22%
FCX - ERMAY
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.70%
RIO - ERMAY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
BHP - ERMAY
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
SCCO - ERMAY
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
More