CQP vs ET
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Buy and ET is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CQP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CQP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CQP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CQP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.89% price change this week, while ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
CQP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
ET is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.83% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| CQP | ET | CQP / ET | |
| Capitalization | 23.9B | 53B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 5.75B | 12.6B | 46% |
| Gain YTD | 11.254 | -9.009 | -125% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.11 | 14.39 | 49% |
| Revenue | 9.66B | 78.6B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 575M | 161M | 357% |
| Total Debt | 16B | 53.2B | 30% |
CQP | ET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (30) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (83). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.
ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (11). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
ET's SMR Rating (59) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (98). This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (52). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (64). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.
| CQP | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 6 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
CQP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQP | 100% | +2.28% | ||
| MPLX - CQP | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| ET - CQP | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| GLP - CQP | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| HESM - CQP | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LNG - CQP | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||