CRBJF
Price
$2.91
Change
-$0.13 (-4.28%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
SIOLY
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CRBJF vs SIOLY

Header iconCRBJF vs SIOLY Comparison
Open Charts CRBJF vs SIOLYBanner chart's image
China Resources Land
Price$2.91
Change-$0.13 (-4.28%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings
Price$0.70
Change-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Volume$3.82K
CapitalizationN/A
CRBJF vs SIOLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIOLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRBJF vs. SIOLY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBJF is a Hold and SIOLY is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CRBJF: $2.91 vs. SIOLY: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: CRBJF and SIOLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRBJF: 113% vs. SIOLY: 224%
Market capitalization -- CRBJF: $33.02B vs. SIOLY: $458.79M
CRBJF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $33.02B. SIOLY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $458.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRBJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIOLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRBJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIOLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIOLY is a better buy in the long-term than CRBJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRBJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIOLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRBJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SIOLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRBJF is a better buy in the short-term than SIOLY.

Price Growth

CRBJF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -5.83% price change this week, while SIOLY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-3.11% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBJF($33B) has a higher market cap than SIOLY($459M). SIOLY has higher P/E ratio than CRBJF: SIOLY (9.36) vs CRBJF (7.36). CRBJF YTD gains are higher at: -17.797 vs. SIOLY (-33.476). CRBJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.9B vs. SIOLY (10.2B). CRBJF has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. SIOLY (15.4B). SIOLY has less debt than CRBJF: SIOLY (95.2B) vs CRBJF (186B). CRBJF has higher revenues than SIOLY: CRBJF (212B) vs SIOLY (67.1B).
CRBJFSIOLYCRBJF / SIOLY
Capitalization33B459M7,190%
EBITDA62.9B10.2B617%
Gain YTD-17.797-33.47653%
P/E Ratio7.369.3679%
Revenue212B67.1B316%
Total Cash108B15.4B701%
Total Debt186B95.2B195%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRBJF vs SIOLY: Fundamental Ratings
CRBJF
SIOLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
892
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
55100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
515
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIOLY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBJF (22). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to CRBJF’s over the last 12 months.

SIOLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBJF (100). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to CRBJF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIOLY (100). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIOLY’s over the last 12 months.

SIOLY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBJF (62). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to CRBJF’s over the last 12 months.

SIOLY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRBJF (51). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRBJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBJFSIOLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIOLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VUZI3.840.32
+9.09%
Vuzix Corp
G43.27-0.37
-0.85%
Genpact Limited
BAC45.05-0.42
-0.92%
Bank of America Corp
IBTX64.05-1.25
-1.91%
Independent Bank Group
BAND19.17-0.38
-1.94%
Bandwidth

CRBJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRBJF and LGFRY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRBJF and LGFRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBJF
1D Price
Change %
CRBJF100%
N/A
LGFRY - CRBJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SIOLY - CRBJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
GZTGF - CRBJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDEVY - CRBJF
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
BEKE - CRBJF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More

SIOLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIOLY has been loosely correlated with SOLLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIOLY jumps, then SOLLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIOLY
1D Price
Change %
SIOLY100%
-1.55%
SOLLY - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AGPYY - SIOLY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHVKY - SIOLY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LGFRY - SIOLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
HLPPF - SIOLY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More