CRBJF
Price
$2.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.02B
WETH
Price
$1.66
Change
+$0.03 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.76M
Ad is loading...

CRBJF vs WETH

Header iconCRBJF vs WETH Comparison
Open Charts CRBJF vs WETHBanner chart's image
China Resources Land
Price$2.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.98K
Capitalization33.02B
Wetouch Technology
Price$1.66
Change+$0.03 (+1.84%)
Volume$106.37K
Capitalization26.76M
CRBJF vs WETH Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WETH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRBJF vs. WETH commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBJF is a Hold and WETH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CRBJF: $2.85 vs. WETH: $1.66)
Brand notoriety: CRBJF and WETH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRBJF: 51% vs. WETH: 31%
Market capitalization -- CRBJF: $33.02B vs. WETH: $26.76M
CRBJF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $33.02B. WETH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $26.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRBJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWETH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRBJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WETH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRBJF is a better buy in the long-term than WETH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRBJF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WETH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRBJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WETH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRBJF is a better buy in the short-term than WETH.

Price Growth

CRBJF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WETH (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.59% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBJF($33B) has a higher market cap than WETH($26.8M). CRBJF has higher P/E ratio than WETH: CRBJF (7.36) vs WETH (2.03). CRBJF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. WETH (-6.215).
CRBJFWETHCRBJF / WETH
Capitalization33B26.8M123,134%
EBITDA62.9BN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-6.215-
P/E Ratio7.362.03363%
Revenue212BN/A-
Total Cash108BN/A-
Total Debt186BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRBJF vs WETH: Fundamental Ratings
CRBJF
WETH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7886
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRBJF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as WETH (52). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew similarly to WETH’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WETH (100). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew similarly to WETH’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as WETH (86). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew similarly to WETH’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as WETH (86). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew similarly to WETH’s over the last 12 months.

WETH's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRBJF (53). This means that WETH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRBJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBJFWETH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WETH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSMTX13.630.10
+0.74%
Hartford Small Cap Value R5
RGRLX10.670.07
+0.66%
RBC Global Equity Leaders R6
FLAPX19.460.10
+0.52%
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index
ESPCX34.300.15
+0.44%
Allspring Special Small Cap Value C
LVOVX21.060.05
+0.24%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R6

CRBJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRBJF and LGFRY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRBJF and LGFRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBJF
1D Price
Change %
CRBJF100%
N/A
LGFRY - CRBJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.85%
SIOLY - CRBJF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZTGF - CRBJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDEVY - CRBJF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
BEKE - CRBJF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
More