CRBN
Price
$258.93
Change
+$1.73 (+0.67%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VT
Price
$160.77
Change
+$0.84 (+0.53%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
97.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRBN vs VT

CRBN vs VT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) vs. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT)

Key Takeaways

  • The iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) applies a low-carbon overlay to a global equity index, resulting in a modestly higher expense ratio of 0.20% compared with the 0.06% expense ratio of the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
  • VT provides broader market-cap coverage through approximately 10,000 holdings across developed and emerging markets via the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while CRBN tracks a low-carbon variant of the MSCI ACWI Index with roughly 1,100 holdings.
  • Both ETFs maintain similar sector weightings dominated by information technology and financials, but CRBN systematically reduces exposure to high-carbon emitters such as certain energy and materials companies.
  • VT offers greater diversification across small-cap stocks, whereas CRBN emphasizes large- and mid-cap names with an explicit environmental constraint that can alter relative performance during sector rotations.
  • Cost efficiency and comprehensive global diversification favor VT for core long-term allocations, while CRBN appeals to investors seeking explicit carbon-intensity reduction within a passive global framework.
  • Neither fund employs leverage, derivatives-based strategies, or active management; both follow transparent, rules-based rebalancing methodologies tied to their underlying indices.

Introduction

Global equity investors often face a choice between broad-market coverage and thematic constraints. The iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) and the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) both deliver diversified exposure to stocks across developed and emerging markets, yet they differ meaningfully in construction. CRBN incorporates a low-carbon optimization screen, while VT seeks to replicate the full investable global equity universe. Comparing these two ETFs helps investors evaluate trade-offs between environmental objectives, cost, and breadth of exposure in a single, low-maintenance vehicle suitable for core portfolio allocations.

iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) Overview

The iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, which selects securities from the MSCI ACWI Index while reducing carbon exposure relative to the parent benchmark. The fund holds approximately 1,100 securities, with top positions typically including large technology and consumer names such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. Sector allocations as of recent data show information technology at roughly 31%, financials near 19%, and industrials around 10%. CRBN maintains a net expense ratio of 0.20% and follows a passive, index-based methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to the underlying index constituents. The strategy distinguishes itself through explicit constraints on carbon-intensive issuers, including limits on thermal coal and oil sands exposure.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) Overview

The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index, providing exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks across approximately 50 countries. The fund contains roughly 10,000 holdings, delivering broad diversification that includes emerging-market issuers. Top holdings mirror those of global large-cap benchmarks, with significant weights in NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon. Sector breakdowns closely track the global equity market, led by information technology and financials. VT carries a net expense ratio of 0.06% and employs a passive indexing approach with regular rebalancing to match index weights. Its defining characteristic is comprehensive market-cap coverage without thematic overlays.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the global equity market, which continues to be shaped by technological innovation, shifting interest-rate expectations, and evolving environmental regulations. Capital flows into low-carbon strategies have accelerated in recent market cycles as institutional and retail investors incorporate sustainability criteria. Regulatory developments in Europe and North America regarding emissions disclosure and transition financing remain key catalysts. Macroeconomic drivers such as corporate earnings growth in technology and healthcare sectors, combined with geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, influence relative performance. Risks include potential underperformance of low-carbon screens during energy-led rallies and higher volatility in emerging markets for broadly diversified funds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have reflected broader global equity trends driven by technology sector strength and moderating inflation expectations. VT’s inclusion of small-cap names has provided slightly different sensitivity to domestic economic data compared with CRBN’s large-cap bias. During periods of sector rotation favoring energy or materials, CRBN’s carbon constraints have produced modest relative underperformance versus the broader market. VT has demonstrated consistent tracking to the full global opportunity set, resulting in lower tracking error relative to traditional market-cap benchmarks. Volatility differences remain modest, with both funds exhibiting correlations typical of global equity exposure, though VT’s greater small-cap weighting can amplify drawdowns in risk-off environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Its materially lower expense ratio, substantially broader diversification across market caps and geographies, and absence of thematic constraints support more consistent long-term risk-adjusted outcomes across varied market regimes. CRBN offers a credible solution for investors with explicit carbon-reduction mandates, yet the incremental cost and narrower holdings universe reduce its relative appeal in a pure efficiency comparison.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CRBN vs. VT commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBN is a Buy and VT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VT has more net assets: 97.9B vs. CRBN (1.18B). VT has a higher annual dividend yield than CRBN: VT (14.144) vs CRBN (13.093). CRBN was incepted earlier than VT: CRBN (12 years) vs VT (18 years). VT (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than CRBN (0.20). CRBN has a higher turnover VT (3.00) vs VT (3.00).
CRBNVTCRBN / VT
Gain YTD13.09314.14493%
Net Assets1.18B97.9B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.200.06333%
Turnover21.003.00700%
Yield2.031.59127%
Fund Existence12 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBNVT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZETX36.432.77
+8.22%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ZETA ETF
DIHP35.740.27
+0.78%
Dimensional International High Pbly ETF
BME46.130.33
+0.72%
Blackrock Health Sciences Trust
KMID25.090.13
+0.52%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MPV16.310.05
+0.31%
Barings Participation Investors

CRBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRBN has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRBN jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBN
1D Price
Change %
CRBN100%
+0.67%
SAN - CRBN
70%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
EMR - CRBN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
GS - CRBN
66%
Closely correlated
+3.73%
MS - CRBN
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
BBVA - CRBN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More

VT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VT has been loosely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VT jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VT
1D Price
Change %
VT100%
+0.53%
MU - VT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
META - VT
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
LLY - VT
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
MSFT - VT
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
AMZN - VT
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More