CROMF
Price
$9.18
Change
-$0.37 (-3.87%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
DBMBF
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CROMF vs DBMBF

Header iconCROMF vs DBMBF Comparison
Open Charts CROMF vs DBMBFBanner chart's image
Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$9.18
Change-$0.37 (-3.87%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$1.62
Change+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Volume$16.3K
CapitalizationN/A
CROMF vs DBMBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CROMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CROMF vs. DBMBF commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CROMF is a Sell and DBMBF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (CROMF: $9.18 vs. DBMBF: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: CROMF and DBMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CROMF: 48% vs. DBMBF: 124%
Market capitalization -- CROMF: $1.83B vs. DBMBF: $1.48B
CROMF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.83B. DBMBF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CROMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CROMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CROMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CROMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBMBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CROMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DBMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the short-term than CROMF.

Price Growth

CROMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -7.09% price change this week, while DBMBF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.30% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CROMF($1.83B) has a higher market cap than DBMBF($1.48B). CROMF has higher P/E ratio than DBMBF: CROMF (760.57) vs DBMBF (12.47). CROMF YTD gains are higher at: -11.219 vs. DBMBF (-14.205). DBMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. CROMF (264M). DBMBF has more cash in the bank: 414M vs. CROMF (0). CROMF has less debt than DBMBF: CROMF (2.19B) vs DBMBF (16B). DBMBF has higher revenues than CROMF: DBMBF (4.11B) vs CROMF (444M).
CROMFDBMBFCROMF / DBMBF
Capitalization1.83B1.48B124%
EBITDA264M2.83B9%
Gain YTD-11.219-14.20579%
P/E Ratio760.5712.476,100%
Revenue444M4.11B11%
Total Cash0414M-
Total Debt2.19B16B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CROMF vs DBMBF: Fundamental Ratings
CROMF
DBMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
8937
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBMBF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CROMF (97). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CROMF (100). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CROMF (89). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CROMF (62). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBMBF (99). This means that CROMF’s stock grew significantly faster than DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CROMFDBMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CROMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRAUX88.570.11
+0.12%
Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth R6
MVISX41.40N/A
N/A
Patient Opportunity IS
ESMCX12.70-0.05
-0.39%
Invesco EQV Euro Small Company C
EEIFX10.22-0.04
-0.39%
Monteagle Enhanced Equity Income Instl
RPEAX36.49-0.17
-0.46%
Davis Opportunity A

CROMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CROMF and RIOCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CROMF and RIOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CROMF
1D Price
Change %
CROMF100%
-3.87%
RIOCF - CROMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
KMMPF - CROMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
APYRF - CROMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
HRUFF - CROMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
MAA - CROMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

DBMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMBF and GWWTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMBF and GWWTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMBF
1D Price
Change %
DBMBF100%
N/A
GWWTF - DBMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - DBMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - DBMBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
CROMF - DBMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
CDPYF - DBMBF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More