Advertisement
CROX vs PVH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crocs (CROX) vs. PVH Corp. (PVH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CROX is riding a strong earnings-driven momentum wave, with a recent quarterly beat and upward guidance revision, while PVH is contending with tariff pressure, softer EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) demand, and a trimmed sales outlook.
- Crocs is generating faster relative performance, with the stock up sharply in recent weeks on margin expansion and a return to growth at its HEYDUDE brand.
- PVH offers a lower-multiple value profile and iconic brands (Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger) but faces greater near-term visibility risk from tariffs and geopolitical headwinds.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: CROX — observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and cleaner catalysts currently favor Crocs over PVH.
- For more detail, explore CROX Major News and CROX Today's Price Move, as well as PVH Major News and PVH Today's Price Move.
- Curious how AI models trade these and other tickers? Explore Trending AI Robots for curated, market-ready trading strategies.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines two well-known names in global apparel and footwear: CROX, the parent of the Crocs and HEYDUDE footwear brands, and PVH, the owner of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger. Although both companies operate in the consumer discretionary space, they have recently diverged in terms of momentum, margin trajectory, and risk profile. Traders and investors weighing relative performance, market positioning, and near-term catalysts may find this comparison useful. The article reviews each company's recent developments and contrasts their business models, growth drivers, and risk factors before offering a data-driven AI-style verdict on which ticker currently presents the more favorable setup.
CROX Overview and Recent Performance
Crocs, Inc. designs and sells casual footwear through the Crocs and HEYDUDE brands across direct-to-consumer and wholesale channels. In recent weeks, CROX delivered one of the stronger earnings reports in the consumer discretionary sector. Third-quarter revenue rose roughly 4.6% year over year to about $1.04 billion, exceeding consensus estimates, while adjusted earnings per share (EPS) climbed by double digits on a year-over-year basis. Management also raised its full-year guidance, including higher revenue-growth and adjusted-EPS targets.
Several factors have supported sentiment. The core Crocs brand posted record quarterly revenue, led by double-digit international growth, while HEYDUDE returned to growth after a period of decline. Operating margins expanded meaningfully, aided by disciplined cost execution. The company also continued returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases and debt repayment. These developments, combined with a pipeline of licensed product launches, have reinforced a positive trend in relative performance during recent market activity.
PVH Overview and Recent Performance
PVH Corp. is a global apparel company whose portfolio is anchored by Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, which together account for nearly all of its revenue. Recent market activity has been more challenging for PVH. The company reported quarterly results that beat earnings and revenue expectations, yet shares declined sharply as management reduced its full-year sales outlook. The revision reflected persistent tariff costs, uneven wholesale demand, and softer consumer conditions in the EMEA region tied to prolonged geopolitical pressures.
PVH's direct-to-consumer and digital-commerce channels have been a bright spot, with growth in stores and online across both brands. Inventory discipline has also improved, and gross margin received a boost from tariff refunds. However, these positives have been offset by constant-currency revenue declines in several regions and a sizable non-cash goodwill impairment charge related to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. As a result, PVH's recent momentum has been more mixed than Crocs', with value-oriented investors watching execution closely.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of covered securities. Because market conditions change constantly, not every bot is equally suited to the current environment. That is why Tickeron curates a dedicated Trending AI Robots section, highlighting only the strategies that are currently best aligned with prevailing market dynamics. These bots span varied approaches, from swing and trend-following systems to shorter-term and volatility-based models, offering traders a broad range of statistical profiles to evaluate. Exploring the section can help you identify automated strategies whose current momentum and risk parameters match your own objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Although both companies sell branded consumer products, their market positioning differs considerably. CROX is a focused, high-margin footwear operator with strong free cash flow, an aggressive buyback program, and a concentrated two-brand strategy. Its recent growth is being driven by international expansion and a HEYDUDE turnaround, though its North America core brand has been roughly flat. In contrast, PVH is a diversified, globally scaled apparel house with two iconic brands and a broader wholesale footprint, but it carries greater exposure to tariffs, currency, and EMEA macroeconomic risk.
On valuation, Crocs trades at a modest forward price-to-earnings multiple but has re-rated higher after its earnings surge. PVH screens as an even deeper value name, though that discount reflects lower near-term earnings visibility. From a momentum standpoint, Crocs has shown stronger trend consistency in recent weeks, while PVH's price action has been more volatile around guidance revisions and impairment charges. Growth drivers also differ: Crocs leans on product innovation and licensing partnerships, whereas PVH is investing in its PVH+ Plan, digital commerce, and brand marketing to stabilize wholesale and rebuild EMEA demand. The key trade-off is clear — Crocs offers current earnings momentum and margin expansion, while PVH offers brand scale and a value-oriented setup with a slower, more uncertain recovery path.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor CROX over PVH. The rationale centers on relative trend consistency and the direction of recent catalysts. Crocs has delivered consecutive earnings beats, raised forward guidance, expanded operating margins, and generated positive share-price momentum — signals of strengthening fundamentals. PVH, by contrast, has trimmed its sales outlook, absorbed a goodwill impairment, and continues to face tariff and EMEA-related headwinds that limit near-term visibility. While both names carry risk, the current weight of evidence points toward Crocs as the more stable, better-positioned ticker in this comparison. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive, reflecting the relative positioning of the two stocks under present market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CROX is a Buy and PVH is a Buy.
Momentum Indicator for CROX turns positive, indicating new upward trend
CROX saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 79 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 60 of the 79 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 76%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CROX just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where CROX's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
CROX moved above its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CROX crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 21 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +1.91% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CROX advanced for three days, in 201 of 274 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CROX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
CROX broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CROX’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: CROX's P/B Ratio (5.302) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.868). P/E Ratio (13.515) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.082). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (0.949). Dividend Yield (0.067) settles around the average of (0.054) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.460) is also within normal values, averaging (1.162).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CROX’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
PVH in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026
PVH moved above its 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 30 of 42 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for PVH crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The 50-day moving average for PVH moved above the 200-day moving average on October 27, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +5.27% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PVH advanced for three days, in 207 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 137 of 200 cases where PVH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 69%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PVH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
PVH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 7 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.895) is normal, around the industry mean (2.811). PVH has a moderately low P/E Ratio (-27.249) as compared to the industry average of (14.457). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.058) is also within normal values, averaging (0.686). Dividend Yield (0.002) settles around the average of (0.254) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.374) is also within normal values, averaging (0.827).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PVH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PVH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
CROX | PVH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PVH's Valuation (7) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CROX (41). This means that PVH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CROX’s over the last 12 months.
CROX's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (100). This means that CROX’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
CROX's SMR Rating (25) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for PVH (92). This means that CROX’s stock grew significantly faster than PVH’s over the last 12 months.
CROX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (42). This means that CROX’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
CROX's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (100). This means that CROX’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
| CROX | PVH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CROX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PVH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CROX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PVH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CROX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PVH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CROX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PVH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CROX (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +28.84% price change this week, while PVH (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +7.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +8.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
CROX is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
PVH is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wholesale Distributors (+8.97% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
@Apparel/Footwear (+1.85% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
Advertisement
CROX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CROX has been loosely correlated with LEVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CROX jumps, then LEVI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CROX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROX | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| LEVI - CROX | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| KTB - CROX | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| COLM - CROX | 51% Loosely correlated | +5.30% | ||
| OXM - CROX | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| PVH - CROX | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
More | ||||
PVH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PVH has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PVH jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVH | 100% | +3.03% | ||
| SHOO - PVH | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LEVI - PVH | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| WWW - PVH | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| NKE - PVH | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| DECK - PVH | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAAU | 38.87 | 0.60 | +1.57% |
| Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) | |||
| FINS | 12.02 | 0.14 | +1.18% |
| Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust | |||
| ELD | 27.60 | 0.11 | +0.40% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) | |||
| DGJA | 32.31 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January (DGJA) | |||
| NOVZ | 46.86 | -0.89 | -1.87% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) | |||