CRSXF vs GCLMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRSXF is a Hold and GCLMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRSXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGCLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRSXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GCLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRSXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CRSXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRSXF (@Coal) experienced а -16.23% price change this week, while GCLMF (@Coal) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (-1.89% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
| CRSXF | GCLMF | CRSXF / GCLMF | |
| Capitalization | 41.3M | 5.33M | 774% |
| EBITDA | -4.31M | -1.13M | 381% |
| Gain YTD | -46.667 | 76.923 | -61% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 175M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 5.44M | 740K | 735% |
| Total Debt | 31.3M | 4.94M | 634% |
CRSXF | GCLMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRSXF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GCLMF (57). This means that CRSXF’s stock grew similarly to GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.
CRSXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GCLMF (100). This means that CRSXF’s stock grew similarly to GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.
GCLMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CRSXF (91). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew similarly to CRSXF’s over the last 12 months.
GCLMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CRSXF (63). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew similarly to CRSXF’s over the last 12 months.
CRSXF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCLMF (100). This means that CRSXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.
| CRSXF | GCLMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 12% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 11% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | N/A |
CRSXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRSXF and SXC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRSXF and SXC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRSXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRSXF | 100% | +5.57% | ||
| SXC - CRSXF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
| CSUAY - CRSXF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.99% | ||
| ITAYY - CRSXF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOAEY - CRSXF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CUAEF - CRSXF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GCLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GCLMF and CRSXF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCLMF and CRSXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRSXF - GCLMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +5.57% | ||
| MOAEF - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CUAEF - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOAEY - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCOZY - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||