Advertisement
CRWD vs ZS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike (CRWD) vs. Zscaler (ZS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has delivered stronger year-to-date performance than ZS, with gains exceeding 60% amid robust demand for its Falcon platform and AI-driven security tools.
- ZS has shown recent monthly gains of approximately 28% while trading at a lower valuation multiple relative to its revenue growth trajectory in the Zero Trust segment.
- Both companies operate in the cybersecurity sector, with CRWD emphasizing endpoint protection and ZS focusing on cloud-native network security.
- Recent market activity for CRWD reflects valuation concerns ahead of earnings, while ZS benefits from analyst target increases tied to platform adoption.
- Growth in annual recurring revenue (ARR) remains a key driver for both, supported by expanding AI security offerings.
- Market positioning favors CRWD in scale and recent momentum, though ZS offers a more compact balance sheet profile.
Introduction
Cybersecurity stocks CRWD and ZS represent leading players in the shift toward cloud-based and AI-enhanced security solutions. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance trends, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Institutional investors, growth-oriented traders, and sector specialists may find the analysis relevant when evaluating exposure to endpoint protection versus cloud network security within the broader technology sector.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CRWD, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., provides cloud-native endpoint protection through its Falcon platform, with growing emphasis on AI Detection and Response capabilities. In recent weeks, the stock experienced a notable pullback of around 16% over five trading days amid pre-earnings positioning and valuation scrutiny, trading near $192 following the move. Year-to-date returns remain strong above 60%, supported by ARR growth in AI modules exceeding 250% quarter-over-quarter and a substantial pipeline. Analyst consensus targets hover near $210, reflecting ongoing demand for cybersecurity amid evolving threats, though concerns over premium multiples have tempered short-term sentiment.
ZS Overview and Recent Performance
ZS, Zscaler, Inc., delivers cloud-native Zero Trust security solutions focused on network and application access. Recent market activity shows the stock rebounding with monthly gains near 28%, closing around $182 after a positive session. Year-to-date performance lags with declines near 19%, though revenue growth of approximately 25% year-over-year and ARR expansion continue to underpin fundamentals. Analyst firms have raised price targets, with consensus levels near $198-$214, citing sustained platform adoption and AI security initiatives. The company maintains a leaner capital structure compared with larger peers in the sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from a large library that covers thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating superior suitability to prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots exhibit diverse annualized returns ranging from 60% to over 200% in select strategies, with win rates typically between 55% and 67% and profit factors often exceeding 2.0. Strategies vary across timeframes from five-minute to hourly signals, incorporating distinct approaches such as trend following and multi-ticker allocation. All AI trading bots maintain unique performance statistics and ticker sets. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for details aligned with individual trading preferences.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD operates at a significantly larger scale with a market capitalization near $195 billion versus approximately $29 billion for ZS. Both companies generate revenue growth in the mid-20% range, yet CRWD benefits from broader endpoint and AI module adoption while ZS emphasizes Zero Trust network security. Recent momentum favors CRWD on a year-to-date basis, though ZS has posted stronger near-term monthly gains amid analyst upgrades. Risk factors include valuation compression for CRWD ahead of earnings and slower share-price recovery for ZS over longer periods. Sector exposure remains concentrated in cybersecurity, with market sentiment reflecting rotation between growth leaders and more measured valuations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probability of near-term favorability to CRWD. The stock’s established scale, accelerating AI-related ARR, and broader analyst support provide a more stable trajectory despite recent volatility, whereas ZS offers attractive relative value but faces longer recovery dynamics. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of recent performance metrics and sector catalysts rather than definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Both ZS and CRWD stand to benefit from increased demand in the cybersecurity and cloud computing space, due to major ransomware attacks that made headlines during the pandemic. CRWD and ZS have both emerged as major players, winning large contracts and making large acquisitions. CRWD is more focused on security and threat mitigation, recently launching Falcon+, which is a global network of trained experts monitoring all aspects of the web and dark web for suspicious signs of nefarious activity that might threaten their clientele. For a less zealous approach, CRWD offers AI-based threat protection for individuals and companies. ZS, as its name implies, is slightly more focused on providing analytics to aid clients of their cloud-based solutions whose companies are scaling up their network. As they grow into the cloud, the analytic tools are designed to not only protect companies from security threats but also to make informed decisions about the effects of changes, such as an increasingly remote workforce.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +13.78% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.72% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRWD | ZS | CRWD / ZS | |
| Capitalization | 224B | 29.8B | 752% |
| EBITDA | 329M | 144M | 228% |
| Gain YTD | 86.364 | -18.091 | -477% |
| P/E Ratio | 5824.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 3.17B | 160% |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 3.54B | 129% |
| Total Debt | 821M | 1.86B | 44% |
CRWD | ZS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZS's Valuation (59) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as ZS (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ZS (40) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
Advertisement