It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSCCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.67% price change this week, while ERO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
CSCCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
ERO is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
CSCCF | ERO | CSCCF / ERO | |
Capitalization | 3.61B | 1.98B | 182% |
EBITDA | 311M | 208M | 150% |
Gain YTD | 37.832 | -3.230 | -1,171% |
P/E Ratio | 62.89 | 19.67 | 320% |
Revenue | 1.36B | 427M | 319% |
Total Cash | 101M | 112M | 90% |
Total Debt | 801M | 446M | 180% |
ERO | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSCCF | ERO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago83% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago74% | 3 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LGCWX | 16.81 | -0.23 | -1.35% |
Lord Abbett Global Equity R6 | |||
HRCAX | 116.14 | -2.65 | -2.23% |
Harbor Capital Appreciation Admin | |||
FGROX | 27.71 | -0.65 | -2.29% |
Emerald Growth Institutional | |||
LCGFX | 31.02 | -0.76 | -2.39% |
William Blair Large Cap Growth I | |||
RYTNX | 341.59 | -9.31 | -2.65% |
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy H |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSCCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSCCF | 100% | -1.89% | ||
HBM - CSCCF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
LUNMF - CSCCF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
FCX - CSCCF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
IVPAF - CSCCF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
TECK - CSCCF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERO has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ERO jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ERO | 100% | -0.97% | ||
HBM - ERO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
SCCO - ERO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
FCX - ERO | 72% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
LUNMF - ERO | 71% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
CSCCF - ERO | 68% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
More |