CSCCF
Price
$8.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
14 days until earnings call
FQVLF
Price
$13.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSCCF vs FQVLF

Header iconCSCCF vs FQVLF Comparison
Open Charts CSCCF vs FQVLFBanner chart's image
CAPSTONE COPPER
Price$8.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$211.05K
CapitalizationN/A
First Quantum Minerals
Price$13.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$215.73K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CSCCF vs FQVLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CSCCF vs. FQVLF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCCF is a Hold and FQVLF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CSCCF: $7.49 vs. FQVLF: $12.62)
Brand notoriety: CSCCF and FQVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCCF: 6% vs. FQVLF: 64%
Market capitalization -- CSCCF: $3.61B vs. FQVLF: $20.45B
CSCCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.61B. FQVLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFQVLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FQVLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FQVLF is a better buy in the long-term than CSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FQVLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSCCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FQVLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSCCF is a better buy in the short-term than FQVLF.

Price Growth

CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.10% price change this week, while FQVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

FQVLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQVLF($20.5B) has a higher market cap than CSCCF($3.61B). CSCCF has higher P/E ratio than FQVLF: CSCCF (62.89) vs FQVLF (50.76). FQVLF (57.074) and CSCCF (56.237) have similar YTD gains . FQVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.32B vs. CSCCF (311M). FQVLF has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. CSCCF (101M). CSCCF has less debt than FQVLF: CSCCF (801M) vs FQVLF (6.74B). FQVLF has higher revenues than CSCCF: FQVLF (6.77B) vs CSCCF (1.36B).
CSCCFFQVLFCSCCF / FQVLF
Capitalization3.61B20.5B18%
EBITDA311M2.32B13%
Gain YTD56.23757.07499%
P/E Ratio62.8950.76124%
Revenue1.36B6.77B20%
Total Cash101M1.09B9%
Total Debt801M6.74B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FQVLF: Fundamental Ratings
FQVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCCFFQVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCCF
1D Price
Change %
CSCCF100%
+1.46%
HBM - CSCCF
75%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
LUNMF - CSCCF
75%
Closely correlated
+3.32%
FCX - CSCCF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
IVPAF - CSCCF
72%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
SCCO - CSCCF
71%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
More

FQVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQVLF has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FQVLF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVLF
1D Price
Change %
FQVLF100%
+2.28%
HBM - FQVLF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
CSCCF - FQVLF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
IVPAF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
SCCO - FQVLF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
ERO - FQVLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More