It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSCCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.93% price change this week, while IE (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.93%.
CSCCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
IE is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
CSCCF | IE | CSCCF / IE | |
Capitalization | 3.61B | 1.19B | 304% |
EBITDA | 311M | -211.06M | -147% |
Gain YTD | 40.491 | -0.198 | -20,408% |
P/E Ratio | 62.89 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.36B | 3.9M | 34,947% |
Total Cash | 101M | 205M | 49% |
Total Debt | 801M | 79.2M | 1,011% |
CSCCF | IE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago83% | 8 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSCCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSCCF | 100% | +1.10% | ||
HBM - CSCCF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
LUNMF - CSCCF | 72% Closely correlated | +3.01% | ||
FCX - CSCCF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
IVPAF - CSCCF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
TECK - CSCCF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IE has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IE jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.