CSCCF
Price
$6.24
Change
+$0.54 (+9.47%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.61B
34 days until earnings call
RTPPF
Price
$58.77
Change
+$2.21 (+3.91%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
107.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSCCF vs RTPPF

Header iconCSCCF vs RTPPF Comparison
Open Charts CSCCF vs RTPPFBanner chart's image
CAPSTONE COPPER
Price$6.24
Change+$0.54 (+9.47%)
Volume$126.69K
Capitalization3.61B
Rio Tinto
Price$58.77
Change+$2.21 (+3.91%)
Volume$866
Capitalization107.7B
CSCCF vs RTPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSCCF vs. RTPPF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCCF is a Hold and RTPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CSCCF: $6.24 vs. RTPPF: $58.77)
Brand notoriety: CSCCF and RTPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCCF: 63% vs. RTPPF: 8%
Market capitalization -- CSCCF: $3.61B vs. RTPPF: $107.7B
CSCCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.61B. RTPPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $107.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTPPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTPPF is a better buy in the long-term than CSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.57% price change this week, while RTPPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTPPF($108B) has a higher market cap than CSCCF($3.61B). CSCCF has higher P/E ratio than RTPPF: CSCCF (62.89) vs RTPPF (12.42). RTPPF YTD gains are higher at: 5.879 vs. CSCCF (1.217). RTPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. CSCCF (311M). RTPPF has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. CSCCF (101M). CSCCF has less debt than RTPPF: CSCCF (801M) vs RTPPF (14.1B). RTPPF has higher revenues than CSCCF: RTPPF (52.4B) vs CSCCF (1.36B).
CSCCFRTPPFCSCCF / RTPPF
Capitalization3.61B108B3%
EBITDA311M20.7B2%
Gain YTD1.2175.87921%
P/E Ratio62.8912.42506%
Revenue1.36B52.4B3%
Total Cash101M10.5B1%
Total Debt801M14.1B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTPPF: Fundamental Ratings
RTPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BILPX10.46N/A
N/A
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Instl
FSCHX12.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Chemicals
PSSMX24.90N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R3
AASOX16.72N/A
N/A
Alger Small Cap Growth I-2
LYRZX14.00N/A
N/A
Lyrical International Value Equity C

CSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCCF
1D Price
Change %
CSCCF100%
+9.44%
HBM - CSCCF
74%
Closely correlated
+9.18%
LUNMF - CSCCF
72%
Closely correlated
+6.76%
FCX - CSCCF
72%
Closely correlated
+6.85%
IVPAF - CSCCF
70%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
TECK - CSCCF
70%
Closely correlated
+8.44%
More