Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs FWRAX
CSFZX vs FWRAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FWRAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$49.72
Change+$0.83 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.16 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51M
CSFZX vs FWRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FWRAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and FWRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. FWRAX (5.51M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than FWRAX: CSFZX (2.79) vs FWRAX (2.33). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FWRAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs FWRAX (9 years). FWRAX (4.04) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FWRAX (32.00). CSFZX (0) and FWRAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.75 vs. FWRAX (0.66). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.03 vs. FWRAX (19.93).
| CSFZX | FWRAX | CSFZX / FWRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 4.04 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.231 | -4.046 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 5.51M | 34,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.75 | 0.66 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.68 | -14.98 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.03 | 19.93 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...