Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs FWRCX
CSFZX vs FWRCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FWRCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate C
Price$10.50
Change-$0.22 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51M
CSFZX vs FWRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FWRCX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and FWRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. FWRCX (5.51M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than FWRCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs FWRCX (1.43). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FWRCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs FWRCX (9 years). FWRCX (4.79) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FWRCX (32.00). CSFZX (0) and FWRCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. FWRCX (6.31). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. FWRCX (44.84).
| CSFZX | FWRCX | CSFZX / FWRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 4.79 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 2.879 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 5.51M | 32,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.43 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 6.31 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.41 | -12.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 44.84 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...