Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs FWRCX
CSFZX vs FWRCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FWRCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate C
Price$10.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.11M
CSFZX vs FWRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FWRCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and FWRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. FWRCX (6.11M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than FWRCX: CSFZX (2.91) vs FWRCX (1.77). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FWRCX: CSFZX (10 years) vs FWRCX (8 years). FWRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX (0) and FWRCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. FWRCX (3.76). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. FWRCX (-4.02).
| CSFZX | FWRCX | CSFZX / FWRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.509 | -0.864 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 6.11M | 28,688% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.77 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.04 | 3.76 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.34 | -13.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -4.02 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.75 | N/A | - |