Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs GARKX
CSFZX vs GARKX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs GARKX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$52.31
Change+$0.17 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Goldman Sachs Global Rl Estt Secs C
Price$9.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.78M
CSFZX vs GARKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. GARKX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and GARKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. GARKX (52.8M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than GARKX: CSFZX (2.79) vs GARKX (1.61). CSFZX was incepted earlier than GARKX: CSFZX (11 years) vs GARKX (10 years). GARKX (2.44) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. GARKX (47.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GARKX: CSFZX (0) vs GARKX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. GARKX (3.90). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. GARKX (32.37).
| CSFZX | GARKX | CSFZX / GARKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.44 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 1.109 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 52.8M | 3,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.61 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 3.90 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | -18.53 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 32.37 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.69 | N/A | - |