Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs MGLCX
CSFZX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$15.65
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
CSFZX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. MGLCX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. CSFZX (1.91B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs MGLCX (1.34). CSFZX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs MGLCX (10 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFZX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. MGLCX (0.50). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 38.59 vs. MGLCX (15.33).
| CSFZX | MGLCX | CSFZX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.94 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.95 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.430 | -2.981 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 2.19B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.34 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | 0.50 | 1,727% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.79 | -23.88 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.59 | 15.33 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.35 | -1.50 | -2,223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...