Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs TARZX
CSFZX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.62
Change+$0.79 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$22.09
Change+$0.24 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.55M
CSFZX vs TARZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TARZX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and TARZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. TARZX (286M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSFZX (2.79) vs TARZX (0.87). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TARZX (7 years). TARZX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TARZX (5.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TARZX: CSFZX (0) vs TARZX (25000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.10 vs. TARZX (7.11). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. TARZX (19.06).
| CSFZX | TARZX | CSFZX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.05 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.10 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.431 | -6.062 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 25000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 286M | 669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 0.87 | 321% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.10 | 7.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.53 | -10.32 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 19.06 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers