Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBGX
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBGX
Calvert Balanced C
Price$43.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$36.17
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02B
CSGCX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. CSGCX (1.38B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBGX (2.23) vs CSGCX (0.67). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: CSGCX (31 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). CSGCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBGX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. CSGCX (3.88). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.69 vs. CSGCX (35.66).
| CSGCX | RLBGX | CSGCX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.25 | 664% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.606 | 6.118 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 248B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.23 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.88 | 6.77 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 32.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 43.69 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | 64.00 | 61% |