CSLM vs HSPO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLM is a Hold and HSPO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSLM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSLM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HSPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSLM’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSLM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- HSPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CSLM (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +3.31% price change this week, while HSPO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSLM is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CSLM | HSPO | CSLM / HSPO | |
| Capitalization | 105M | 94.1M | 112% |
| EBITDA | -1.14M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | -1.467 | -296% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.93 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 174K | 289K | 60% |
| Total Debt | 600K | 70K | 857% |
| CSLM | HSPO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 6% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 3% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 13% | 11 days ago 5% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 11% | 11 days ago 6% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 11% | 11 days ago 8% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 5% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CUSIX | 14.45 | 0.10 | +0.70% |
| Cullen Small Cap Value I | |||
| HILSX | 17.82 | 0.12 | +0.68% |
| Hartford International Value R4 | |||
| MMMPX | 21.24 | 0.09 | +0.43% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts R6 | |||
| ASQGX | 16.72 | 0.07 | +0.42% |
| American Century Small Company R5 | |||
| TSMEX | 15.20 | 0.06 | +0.40% |
| Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq A | |||
CSLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSLM has been loosely correlated with RFACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSLM jumps, then RFACU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSLM | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| RFACU - CSLM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| LATG - CSLM | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PLMJU - CSLM | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| PLMJ - CSLM | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.21% | ||
| WINV - CSLM | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HSPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSPO has been loosely correlated with WINV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSPO jumps, then WINV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSPO | 100% | N/A | ||
| WINV - HSPO | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FTII - HSPO | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.36% | ||
| HSPOU - HSPO | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CSLM - HSPO | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| GLST - HSPO | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||