CSLMF vs RFAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and RFAC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRFAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RFAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RFAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSLMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- RFAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -5.91% price change this week, while RFAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -42.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSLMF is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.
RFAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 26, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+3.48% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CSLMF | RFAC | CSLMF / RFAC | |
| Capitalization | 105M | 77.6M | 135% |
| EBITDA | -1.14M | -2.2M | 52% |
| Gain YTD | -3.043 | -43.330 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.93 | 540.50 | 3% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 174K | 4.07K | 4,279% |
| Total Debt | 600K | 793K | 76% |
| CSLMF | RFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 13% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 13% | N/A |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 11% | N/A |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 11% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 27% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FOSKX | 65.80 | 0.40 | +0.61% |
| Fidelity Overseas K | |||
| GIDUX | 6.95 | 0.04 | +0.58% |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem R6 | |||
| FSTKX | 32.22 | 0.12 | +0.37% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc | |||
| GASFX | 27.50 | -0.08 | -0.29% |
| Hennessy Gas Utility Investor | |||
| THBVX | 8.33 | -0.03 | -0.36% |
| Victory THB US Small Opportunities A | |||
CSLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSLMF has been loosely correlated with RFACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSLMF jumps, then RFACU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RFACU - CSLMF | 61% Loosely correlated | -27.20% | ||
| AQU - CSLMF | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PLMJU - CSLMF | 32% Poorly correlated | -11.54% | ||
| PLMJ - CSLMF | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| WINV - CSLMF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||
RFAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFAC has been closely correlated with RFACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFAC jumps, then RFACU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFAC | 100% | -13.33% | ||
| RFACU - RFAC | 69% Closely correlated | -27.20% | ||
| CLBR - RFAC | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| CSLMF - RFAC | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JWSMF - RFAC | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FACT - RFAC | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||