CSLMF
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.39 (+3.36%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
VMCA
Price
$11.65
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
132.59M
Ad is loading...

CSLMF vs VMCA

Header iconCSLMF vs VMCA Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs VMCABanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$12.00
Change+$0.39 (+3.36%)
Volume$500
Capitalization105.06M
Valuence Merger
Price$11.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$8.12K
Capitalization132.59M
CSLMF vs VMCA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. VMCA commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and VMCA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $12.00 vs. VMCA: $11.65)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and VMCA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 32% vs. VMCA: 237%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $105.06M vs. VMCA: $132.59M
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.06M. VMCA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $132.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVMCA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VMCA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSLMF is a better buy in the long-term than VMCA.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while VMCA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

VMCA is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMCA($133M) has a higher market cap than CSLMF($105M). VMCA has higher P/E ratio than CSLMF: VMCA (43.69) vs CSLMF (16.93). CSLMF YTD gains are higher at: 4.348 vs. VMCA (1.128). CSLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. VMCA (-1.39M). VMCA has more cash in the bank: 685K vs. CSLMF (174K). CSLMF has less debt than VMCA: CSLMF (600K) vs VMCA (2.26M). CSLMF (0) and VMCA (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFVMCACSLMF / VMCA
Capitalization105M133M79%
EBITDA-1.14M-1.39M82%
Gain YTD4.3481.128385%
P/E Ratio16.9343.6939%
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K685K25%
Total Debt600K2.26M27%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSEPX20.92-0.02
-0.10%
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts C
HCPSX85.26-0.62
-0.72%
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Svc
PFRSX28.85-0.27
-0.93%
Principal Real Estate Securities Fd R6
IBNYX24.08-0.24
-0.99%
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class Y
SCSIX38.32-0.98
-2.49%
Sterling Capital SmCp Val R6

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and AQU have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and AQU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
AQU - CSLMF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINV - CSLMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
VMCA - CSLMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXAI - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.46%
More

VMCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMCA has been loosely correlated with IVCAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VMCA jumps, then IVCAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMCA
1D Price
Change %
VMCA100%
N/A
IVCAU - VMCA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PORT - VMCA
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLMF - VMCA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVACU - VMCA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAC - VMCA
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More