CSLMF vs WINV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and WINV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWINV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WINV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while WINV (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
WINV is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CSLMF | WINV | CSLMF / WINV | |
| Capitalization | 105M | 46M | 228% |
| EBITDA | -1.14M | -2.01M | 56% |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | 2.500 | 174% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.93 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 174K | 1.67K | 10,394% |
| Total Debt | 600K | 938K | 64% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUIBX | 21.35 | -0.15 | -0.70% |
| Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst | |||
| SSAQX | 72.87 | -1.19 | -1.61% |
| State Street US Core Equity Fund | |||
| BIEEX | 17.13 | -0.33 | -1.89% |
| BlackRock GA Dynamic Eq Instl | |||
| MCGRX | 17.45 | -0.36 | -2.02% |
| BlackRock Natural Resources Inv C | |||
| PBMIX | 7.87 | -0.32 | -3.91% |
| Polen US SMID Company Growth Instl | |||
CSLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and AQU have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and AQU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AQU - CSLMF | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WINV - CSLMF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HSPO - CSLMF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| VMCA - CSLMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CXAI - CSLMF | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.46% | ||
More | ||||