CSLMU
Price
$11.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:10 PM (EDT)
EVGR
Price
$11.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Ad is loading...

CSLMU vs EVGR

Header iconCSLMU vs EVGR Comparison
Open Charts CSLMU vs EVGRBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Evergreen
Price$11.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.49K
CapitalizationN/A
CSLMU vs EVGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
EVGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMU vs. EVGR commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMU is a Hold and EVGR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (CSLMU: $11.69 vs. EVGR: $11.86)
Brand notoriety: CSLMU and EVGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMU: 100% vs. EVGR: 933%
Market capitalization -- CSLMU: $0 vs. EVGR: $123.64M
CSLMU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. EVGR’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $123.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEVGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EVGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EVGR is a better buy in the long-term than CSLMU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVGR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EVGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLMU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EVGR (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

EVGR is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+2.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLMU YTD gains are higher at: 9.049 vs. EVGR (5.991). EVGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -911.11K vs. CSLMU (-1.14M). CSLMU has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. EVGR (236). CSLMU has less debt than EVGR: CSLMU (600K) vs EVGR (2.9M). CSLMU (0) and EVGR (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMUEVGRCSLMU / EVGR
CapitalizationN/A124M-
EBITDA-1.14M-911.11K125%
Gain YTD9.0495.991151%
P/E RatioN/A42.00-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K23673,729%
Total Debt600K2.9M21%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMUEVGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EVGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRCEX28.140.22
+0.79%
Principal Real Estate Securities C
WAMFX23.270.18
+0.78%
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
EISIX24.550.05
+0.20%
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock I
GMZPX34.76N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts P
BKLSX9.51N/A
N/A
BlackRock U.S. Insights Long/Shrt Eq K

CSLMU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSLMU has been loosely correlated with PWUP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSLMU jumps, then PWUP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMU
1D Price
Change %
CSLMU100%
N/A
PWUP - CSLMU
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CITEU - CSLMU
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPWR - CSLMU
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
GBBK - CSLMU
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
RENEU - CSLMU
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EVGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVGR has been loosely correlated with NPABU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EVGR jumps, then NPABU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVGR
1D Price
Change %
EVGR100%
N/A
NPABU - EVGR
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BUJAU - EVGR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYAC - EVGR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPAB - EVGR
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMU - EVGR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More