CSLUF
Price
$10.92
Change
-$58.31 (-84.23%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PORT
Price
$11.60
Change
-$0.23 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
75.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs PORT

Header iconCSLUF vs PORT Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs PORTBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$10.92
Change-$58.31 (-84.23%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Southport Acquisition
Price$11.60
Change-$0.23 (-1.94%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization75.08M
CSLUF vs PORT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. PORT commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a StrongBuy and PORT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $10.92 vs. PORT: $11.60)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and PORT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 57% vs. PORT: 18%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. PORT: $75.08M
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. PORT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $75.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePORT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PORT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PORT is a better buy in the long-term than CSLUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PORT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PORT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLUF is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

PORT is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PORT YTD gains are higher at: 4.129 vs. CSLUF (-6.587). CSLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. PORT (-12.02M). PORT has more cash in the bank: 2.35M vs. CSLUF (174K). PORT has less debt than CSLUF: PORT (60.2K) vs CSLUF (600K). CSLUF (0) and PORT (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLUFPORTCSLUF / PORT
CapitalizationN/A75.1M-
EBITDA-1.14M-12.02M9%
Gain YTD-6.5874.129-160%
P/E RatioN/A39.96-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K2.35M7%
Total Debt600K60.2K997%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUFPORT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
3%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MODD0.730.03
+4.31%
Modular Medical
SOHOO16.470.36
+2.24%
Sotherly Hotels
TFII93.98-0.15
-0.16%
TFI International
OXM43.30-0.33
-0.76%
Oxford Industries
MTC1.04-0.01
-1.07%
MMTec Inc

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
N/A
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
+24.02%
SZZLU - CSLUF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
FGMCU - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AIMTF - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - CSLUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PORT has been loosely correlated with BEEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PORT jumps, then BEEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PORT
1D Price
Change %
PORT100%
N/A
BEEP - PORT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
CSTUF - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCAF - PORT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
CSTAF - PORT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - PORT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More