It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePORT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PORT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +8.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.79%.
CSLUF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
PORT is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2025.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
CSLUF | PORT | CSLUF / PORT | |
Capitalization | N/A | 75.1M | - |
EBITDA | -1.14M | -12.02M | 9% |
Gain YTD | -0.855 | 16.697 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 39.96 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 174K | 2.35M | 7% |
Total Debt | 600K | 60.2K | 997% |
CSLUF | PORT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago29% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago20% | 1 day ago3% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago20% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago17% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago16% | 1 day ago26% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago18% | 1 day ago25% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago2% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago19% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSLUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSLUF | 100% | N/A | ||
NPWR - CSLUF | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
SZZLU - CSLUF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
FGMCU - CSLUF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AIMTF - CSLUF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PORT - CSLUF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |