CSLUF
Price
$10.51
Change
+$0.50 (+5.00%)
Updated
Jan 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PWUP
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.47 (+4.08%)
Updated
Jan 23 closing price
Capitalization
99.04M
Ad is loading...

CSLUF vs PWUP

Header iconCSLUF vs PWUP Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs PWUPBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$10.51
Change+$0.50 (+5.00%)
Volume$1.24K
CapitalizationN/A
PowerUp Acquisition
Price$12.00
Change+$0.47 (+4.08%)
Volume$3.39K
Capitalization99.04M
CSLUF vs PWUP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWUP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. PWUP commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a Hold and PWUP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $10.51 vs. PWUP: $12.00)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and PWUP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 77% vs. PWUP: 253%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. PWUP: $99.04M
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. PWUP’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $99.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWUP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PWUP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSLUF is a better buy in the long-term than PWUP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWUP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PWUP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWUP is a better buy in the short-term than CSLUF.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -17.70% price change this week, while PWUP (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWUP is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+3.48% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWUP YTD gains are higher at: 4.348 vs. CSLUF (-10.094). PWUP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.47M vs. CSLUF (-1.14M). CSLUF has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. PWUP (0). PWUP has less debt than CSLUF: PWUP (12.4K) vs CSLUF (600K). CSLUF (0) and PWUP (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLUFPWUPCSLUF / PWUP
CapitalizationN/A99M-
EBITDA-1.14M4.47M-25%
Gain YTD-10.0944.348-232%
P/E RatioN/A48.04-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K0-
Total Debt600K12.4K4,839%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUFPWUP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
11%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
1%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWUP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRMGX18.710.11
+0.59%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R6
GFDDX101.240.59
+0.59%
Invesco Global R5
GPTUX14.050.05
+0.34%
GuidePath® Tactical Allocation Svc
FIJGX53.830.08
+0.15%
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications Z
ARAOX11.19N/A
N/A
Aristotle/Saul Global Eq A

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSLUF has been loosely correlated with PWUP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSLUF jumps, then PWUP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
+5.00%
PWUP - CSLUF
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.11%
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
GBBK - CSLUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RENEU - CSLUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVGR - CSLUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PWUP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWUP has been loosely correlated with CSLUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWUP jumps, then CSLUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWUP
1D Price
Change %
PWUP100%
+4.11%
CSLUF - PWUP
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
BEEP - PWUP
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
WELNF - PWUP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFFS - PWUP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EONR - PWUP
24%
Poorly correlated
-15.94%
More