Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSM vs FQAL
CSM vs FQAL Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs FQAL
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$68.63
Change+$0.65 (+0.96%)
Volume$215
Net Assets430.38M
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$67.74
Change+$0.65 (+0.97%)
Volume$300
Net Assets1.01B
CSM vs FQAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSM vs. FQAL commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSM is a StrongBuy and FQAL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQAL has more net assets: 1.01B vs. CSM (430M). FQAL (4.193) and CSM (4.020) have matching annual dividend yield . CSM was incepted earlier than FQAL: CSM (16 years) vs FQAL (9 years). FQAL (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45). CSM has a higher turnover FQAL (34.00) vs FQAL (34.00).
| CSM | FQAL | CSM / FQAL | |
| Gain YTD | 4.020 | 4.193 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 430M | 1.01B | 43% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.16 | 281% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 34.00 | 168% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 1.22 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 85% | 20 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 4 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 80% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 69% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| LIN - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| LAMR - FQAL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||