Ad is loading...
CSM vs FQAL
CSM vs FQAL Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs FQAL
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$62.77
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Volume$300
Net Assets420.1M
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$62.76
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$100
Net Assets990.44M
CSM vs FQAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSM vs. FQAL commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSM is a Buy and FQAL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQAL has more net assets: 990M vs. CSM (420M). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than CSM: FQAL (-3.508) vs CSM (-4.846). CSM was incepted earlier than FQAL: CSM (16 years) vs FQAL (9 years). FQAL (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45). CSM has a higher turnover FQAL (34.00) vs FQAL (34.00).
| CSM | FQAL | CSM / FQAL | |
| Gain YTD | -4.846 | -3.508 | 138% |
| Net Assets | 420M | 990M | 42% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.16 | 281% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 34.00 | 168% |
| Yield | 1.14 | 1.28 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 69% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SPGI - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||