Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSM vs GFGF
CSM vs GFGF Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs GFGF
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$71.96
Change+$0.38 (+0.53%)
Volume$4.61K
Net Assets450.17M
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
Price$32.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.55M
CSM vs GFGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSM vs. GFGF commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSM is a Hold and GFGF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSM has more net assets: 450M vs. GFGF (34.5M). CSM has a higher annual dividend yield than GFGF: CSM (9.401) vs GFGF (2.958). CSM was incepted earlier than GFGF: CSM (16 years) vs GFGF (4 years). CSM (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than GFGF (0.65). CSM has a higher turnover GFGF (33.00) vs GFGF (33.00).
| CSM | GFGF | CSM / GFGF | |
| Gain YTD | 9.401 | 2.958 | 318% |
| Net Assets | 450M | 34.5M | 1,304% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.65 | 69% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 33.00 | 173% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 0.10 | 1,063% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | GFGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSM has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSM jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSM | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| PH - CSM | 85% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| TROW - CSM | 82% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| TRMB - CSM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| BX - CSM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MS - CSM | 79% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
GFGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFGF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFGF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MSFT - GFGF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| APO - GFGF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AMZN - GFGF | 69% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| INTU - GFGF | 69% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| AMAT - GFGF | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||