Ad is loading...
CSM vs QARP
CSM vs QARP Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs QARP
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$62.77
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Volume$5.94K
Net Assets422.4M
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF
Price$50.03
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
Volume$1.93K
Net Assets58.81M
CSM vs QARP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSM vs. QARP commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSM is a Buy and QARP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSM has more net assets: 422M vs. QARP (58.8M). QARP has a higher annual dividend yield than CSM: QARP (-4.328) vs CSM (-4.846). CSM was incepted earlier than QARP: CSM (16 years) vs QARP (7 years). QARP (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45). CSM has a higher turnover QARP (22.00) vs QARP (22.00).
| CSM | QARP | CSM / QARP | |
| Gain YTD | -4.846 | -4.328 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 422M | 58.8M | 718% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 22.00 | 259% |
| Yield | 1.14 | 1.38 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 13 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSM has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSM jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSM | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| FTV - CSM | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BX - CSM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| TRMB - CSM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| MCHP - CSM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| LRCX - CSM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
QARP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QARP has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QARP jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QARP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QARP | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| MAR - QARP | 74% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| HST - QARP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| CRH - QARP | 71% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| LECO - QARP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| COF - QARP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||