Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSM vs QLTY
CSM vs QLTY Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs QLTY
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$71.24
Change+$0.32 (+0.45%)
Volume$200
Net Assets447.42M
CSM vs QLTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSM vs. QLTY commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSM is a Hold and QLTY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLTY has more net assets: 2.21B vs. CSM (447M). CSM (7.820) and QLTY (7.795) have matching annual dividend yield . CSM was incepted earlier than QLTY: CSM (16 years) vs QLTY (2 years). CSM (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than QLTY (0.50). CSM has a higher turnover QLTY (7.00) vs QLTY (7.00).
| CSM | QLTY | CSM / QLTY | |
| Gain YTD | 7.820 | 7.795 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 447M | 2.21B | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.50 | 90% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 7.00 | 814% |
| Yield | 1.07 | 0.59 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | QLTY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSM has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSM jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSM | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| TRMB - CSM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| WAB - CSM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| BX - CSM | 80% Closely correlated | +3.83% | ||
| FTV - CSM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| ZBRA - CSM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||
QLTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLTY has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLTY jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLTY | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| AXP - QLTY | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| HLT - QLTY | 71% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| AAPL - QLTY | 70% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| AMZN - QLTY | 70% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MSFT - QLTY | 69% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||