Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs FWRAX
CSSPX vs FWRAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs FWRAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$52.58
Change-$0.49 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate A
Price$10.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94M
CSSPX vs FWRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. FWRAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and FWRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. FWRAX (5.94M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than FWRAX: CSSPX (2.86) vs FWRAX (2.34). CSSPX was incepted earlier than FWRAX: CSSPX (28 years) vs FWRAX (9 years). FWRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSSPX (52.00). FWRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: FWRAX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX (7.69) and FWRAX (7.39) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 1.59 vs. FWRAX (-0.10).
| CSSPX | FWRAX | CSSPX / FWRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.017 | 3.179 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 5.94M | 30,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.34 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 7.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.05 | -3.80 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.59 | -0.10 | -1,560% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...