Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs FWRAX
CSSPX vs FWRAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs FWRAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$49.70
Change+$0.83 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.16 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51M
CSSPX vs FWRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. FWRAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Hold and FWRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. FWRAX (5.51M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than FWRAX: CSSPX (2.74) vs FWRAX (2.33). CSSPX was incepted earlier than FWRAX: CSSPX (28 years) vs FWRAX (9 years). FWRAX (4.04) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FWRAX (32.00). FWRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: FWRAX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX (0.70) and FWRAX (0.66) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.69 vs. FWRAX (19.93).
| CSSPX | FWRAX | CSSPX / FWRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.20 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 4.04 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.252 | -4.046 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 5.51M | 34,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.33 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.70 | 0.66 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.82 | -14.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.69 | 19.93 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...