Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs FWRAX
CSSPX vs FWRAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs FWRAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$51.52
Change-$0.69 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate A
Price$10.33
Change-$0.15 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.11M
CSSPX vs FWRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. FWRAX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Hold and FWRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. FWRAX (6.11M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than FWRAX: CSSPX (2.86) vs FWRAX (2.34). CSSPX was incepted earlier than FWRAX: CSSPX (28 years) vs FWRAX (8 years). FWRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSSPX (52.00). FWRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: FWRAX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.40 vs. FWRAX (4.68). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FWRAX (0.70).
| CSSPX | FWRAX | CSSPX / FWRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.292 | 0.963 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 6.11M | 28,688% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.34 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.40 | 4.68 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.37 | -8.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.55 | 0.70 | 509% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...