Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs FWRTX
CSSPX vs FWRTX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs FWRTX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$52.01
Change+$0.26 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate M
Price$10.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51M
CSSPX vs FWRTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. FWRTX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and FWRTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. FWRTX (5.51M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than FWRTX: CSSPX (2.74) vs FWRTX (2.12). CSSPX was incepted earlier than FWRTX: CSSPX (28 years) vs FWRTX (9 years). FWRTX (4.29) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FWRTX (32.00). FWRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: FWRTX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX (9.31) and FWRTX (9.31) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.88 vs. FWRTX (32.70).
| CSSPX | FWRTX | CSSPX / FWRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 4.29 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.900 | 1.736 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 5.51M | 34,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 9.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.19 | -10.50 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.88 | 32.70 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...