Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs FWRTX
CSSPX vs FWRTX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs FWRTX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$51.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate M
Price$10.46
Change-$0.22 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51M
CSSPX vs FWRTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. FWRTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Hold and FWRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. FWRTX (5.51M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than FWRTX: CSSPX (2.74) vs FWRTX (2.12). CSSPX was incepted earlier than FWRTX: CSSPX (28 years) vs FWRTX (9 years). FWRTX (4.29) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FWRTX (32.00). FWRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: FWRTX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). FWRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. CSSPX (6.59). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 52.29 vs. FWRTX (48.36).
| CSSPX | FWRTX | CSSPX / FWRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 4.29 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.449 | 2.989 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 5.51M | 32,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 6.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.56 | -11.06 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.29 | 48.36 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.35 | N/A | - |