CSTL
Price
$27.02
Change
+$0.50 (+1.89%)
Updated
Dec 19, 04:10 PM (EDT)
75 days until earnings call
PRPO
Price
$5.35
Change
-$0.21 (-3.78%)
Updated
Dec 19, 02:21 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

CSTL vs PRPO

Header iconCSTL vs PRPO Comparison
Open Charts CSTL vs PRPOBanner chart's image
Castle Biosciences
Price$27.02
Change+$0.50 (+1.89%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Precipio
Price$5.35
Change-$0.21 (-3.78%)
Volume$381
CapitalizationN/A
CSTL vs PRPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTL vs. PRPO commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTL is a Hold and PRPO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CSTL: $26.52 vs. PRPO: $5.56)
Brand notoriety: CSTL and PRPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTL: 54% vs. PRPO: 71%
Market capitalization -- CSTL: $608.02M vs. PRPO: $9.51M
CSTL [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $608.02M. PRPO’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $9.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRPO is a better buy in the long-term than CSTL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSTL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRPO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSTL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSTL is a better buy in the short-term than PRPO.

Price Growth

CSTL (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -10.04% price change this week, while PRPO (@Medical Specialties) price change was -7.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSTL is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

PRPO is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-3.63% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSTL($608M) has a higher market cap than PRPO($9.52M). CSTL YTD gains are higher at: 22.892 vs. PRPO (-14.462). PRPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.52M vs. CSTL (-45.02M). CSTL has more cash in the bank: 243M vs. PRPO (1.56M). PRPO has less debt than CSTL: PRPO (1.3M) vs CSTL (15.3M). CSTL has higher revenues than PRPO: CSTL (220M) vs PRPO (13.3M).
CSTLPRPOCSTL / PRPO
Capitalization608M9.52M6,390%
EBITDA-45.02M-7.52M598%
Gain YTD22.892-14.462-158%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue220M13.3M1,654%
Total Cash243M1.56M15,557%
Total Debt15.3M1.3M1,181%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPO: Fundamental Ratings
PRPO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSTLPRPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSSJX26.88N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index J
FSTEX27.64-0.72
-2.54%
Invesco Energy Inv
NQGCX34.18-0.92
-2.62%
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
MLPIX112.89-4.56
-3.88%
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Inv
KAUCX3.73-0.16
-4.11%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann C

CSTL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSTL has been loosely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSTL jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTL
1D Price
Change %
CSTL100%
-5.76%
VCYT - CSTL
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
FLGT - CSTL
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
MMSI - CSTL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
CTKB - CSTL
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
MYGN - CSTL
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.12%
More

PRPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPO and APDN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPO and APDN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPO
1D Price
Change %
PRPO100%
-2.50%
APDN - PRPO
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
VTAK - PRPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.84%
TNON - PRPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
CSTL - PRPO
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
TIVC - PRPO
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.45%
More