CSTUF
Price
$11.42
Change
+$0.05 (+0.44%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MANDF
Price
$6.00
Change
+$1.00 (+20.00%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.87B
Ad is loading...

CSTUF vs MANDF

Header iconCSTUF vs MANDF Comparison
Open Charts CSTUF vs MANDFBanner chart's image
Constellation Acquisition Corp I
Price$11.42
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
Volume$215
CapitalizationN/A
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$6.00
Change+$1.00 (+20.00%)
Volume$240
Capitalization2.87B
CSTUF vs MANDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTUF vs. MANDF commentary
Apr 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTUF is a Hold and MANDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CSTUF: $11.42 vs. MANDF: $6.00)
Brand notoriety: CSTUF and MANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTUF: 65% vs. MANDF: 26%
Market capitalization -- CSTUF: $0 vs. MANDF: $2.87B
CSTUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. MANDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $2.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMANDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than CSTUF.

Price Growth

CSTUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF YTD gains are higher at: 33.333 vs. CSTUF (0.175).
CSTUFMANDFCSTUF / MANDF
CapitalizationN/A2.87B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.17533.3331%
P/E RatioN/A16.60-
RevenueN/A1.42B-
Total CashN/A890M-
Total DebtN/A299M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALAFX63.580.73
+1.16%
Alger Focus Equity A
FMDRX28.39N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
SDFSX14.51N/A
N/A
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth S
CSEYX16.68-0.11
-0.66%
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst3
WLCTX9.68-0.37
-3.68%
Wilshire International Equity Invmt

CSTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSTUF and PORT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSTUF and PORT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTUF
1D Price
Change %
CSTUF100%
N/A
PORT - CSTUF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMTM - CSTUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MANDF - CSTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAC - CSTUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORTU - CSTUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MANDF and GBBK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANDF and GBBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
GBBK - MANDF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - MANDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
BOWN - MANDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
KVAC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More