CSUAY vs WHITF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAY is a Hold and WHITF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSUAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHITF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CSUAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WHITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSUAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CSUAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSUAY (@Coal) experienced а -8.33% price change this week, while WHITF (@Coal) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.25%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (-3.04% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
| CSUAY | WHITF | CSUAY / WHITF | |
| Capitalization | 75.9B | 3.87B | 1,963% |
| EBITDA | 96.8B | 5.1B | 1,898% |
| Gain YTD | -14.644 | -7.047 | 208% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.08 | 1.96 | 311% |
| Revenue | 348B | 7.29B | 4,776% |
| Total Cash | 186B | 107M | 173,832% |
| Total Debt | 55.2B | 1.03B | 5,385% |
CSUAY | WHITF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSUAY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as WHITF (40). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew similarly to WHITF’s over the last 12 months.
CSUAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHITF (56). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHITF’s over the last 12 months.
CSUAY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as WHITF (59). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew similarly to WHITF’s over the last 12 months.
CSUAY's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as WHITF (83). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew similarly to WHITF’s over the last 12 months.
WHITF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSUAY (57). This means that WHITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSUAY’s over the last 12 months.
| CSUAY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HLEZX | 17.59 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| Harding Loevner Instl Emerg Mkts Z | |||
| DISRX | 23.87 | -0.11 | -0.46% |
| BNY Mellon International Stock Fund I | |||
| NSFEX | 10.82 | -0.07 | -0.64% |
| Natixis Target Retirement 2025 N | |||
| RRGCX | 7.11 | -0.06 | -0.84% |
| DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Secc C | |||
| JDSRX | 21.67 | -0.47 | -2.12% |
| Janus Henderson Small Cap Value R | |||
WHITF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHITF has been loosely correlated with HCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHITF jumps, then HCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WHITF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHITF | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| HCC - WHITF | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| BTU - WHITF | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.55% | ||
| ARCH - WHITF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMR - WHITF | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.63% | ||
| CSUAY - WHITF | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.66% | ||
More | ||||