Ad is loading...
CSUIX vs RGFTX
CSUIX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUIX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I
Price$24.42
Change+$0.13 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.88M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.71
Change+$0.07 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.2M
CSUIX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUIX vs. RGFTX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUIX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUIX has more cash in the bank: 834M vs. RGFTX (345M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUIX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUIX (2.39). CSUIX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUIX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CSUIX (0.94). CSUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSUIX: RGFTX (0) vs CSUIX (100000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.32 vs. CSUIX (12.96). CSUIX return over 5 years is better than : 59.12 vs. RGFTX (44.00).
| CSUIX | RGFTX | CSUIX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.174 | 7.759 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 345M | 242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 3.01 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.96 | 15.32 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.70 | 9.20 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.12 | 44.00 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers