CTMCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
DDEJF
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CTMCF vs DDEJF

Header iconCTMCF vs DDEJF Comparison
Open Charts CTMCF vs DDEJFBanner chart's image
Canterra Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$802.65K
CapitalizationN/A
Dundee
Price$1.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.5K
CapitalizationN/A
CTMCF vs DDEJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DDEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMCF vs. DDEJF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMCF is a Hold and DDEJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CTMCF: $0.07 vs. DDEJF: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: CTMCF and DDEJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMCF: 111% vs. DDEJF: 118%
Market capitalization -- CTMCF: $7.71M vs. DDEJF: $85.39M
CTMCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.71M. DDEJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $85.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDDEJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DDEJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDEJF is a better buy in the long-term than CTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDEJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • DDEJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DDEJF is a better buy in the short-term than CTMCF.

Price Growth

CTMCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while DDEJF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDEJF($85.4M) has a higher market cap than CTMCF($7.71M). DDEJF YTD gains are higher at: 49.168 vs. CTMCF (3.687). CTMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.41M vs. DDEJF (-18.48M). DDEJF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. CTMCF (792K). DDEJF has higher revenues than CTMCF: DDEJF (7.19M) vs CTMCF (0).
CTMCFDDEJFCTMCF / DDEJF
Capitalization7.71M85.4M9%
EBITDA-1.41M-18.48M8%
Gain YTD3.68749.1687%
P/E RatioN/A4.43-
Revenue07.19M-
Total Cash792K158M1%
Total DebtN/A8.64M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMCF vs DDEJF: Fundamental Ratings
CTMCF
DDEJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9966
SMR RATING
1..100
9440
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5796
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DDEJF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CTMCF (84). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew similarly to CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMCF (99). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMCF (94). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DDEJF (45). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to DDEJF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDEJF (96). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDEJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMCFDDEJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DDEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBEMX19.89N/A
N/A
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets A
GRESX11.81N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Svc
NIQAX13.51N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Eq A
FBFQX12.71-0.01
-0.08%
Franklin Managed Income R
FGCKX45.51-0.20
-0.44%
Fidelity Growth Company K

CTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMCF and CQRLF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMCF and CQRLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMCF
1D Price
Change %
CTMCF100%
-1.26%
CQRLF - CTMCF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - CTMCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.60%
DGDCF - CTMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+28.13%
CPNFF - CTMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
CNRIF - CTMCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
More

DDEJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDEJF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDEJF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDEJF
1D Price
Change %
DDEJF100%
-6.60%
HWAUF - DDEJF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPTF - DDEJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
RGCCF - DDEJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMLRF - DDEJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGDCF - DDEJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+28.13%
More