CTOS vs PLXS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOS is a Buy and PLXS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTOS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLXS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CTOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLXS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTOS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLXS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PLXS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTOS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +10.37% price change this week, while PLXS (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +6.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +7.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
PLXS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+6.58% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Electronic Components (+7.00% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| CTOS | PLXS | CTOS / PLXS | |
| Capitalization | 1.4B | 3.4B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 408M | 241M | 169% |
| Gain YTD | -13.721 | -19.670 | 70% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.00 | 24.46 | 114% |
| Revenue | 1.87B | 3.95B | 47% |
| Total Cash | 10.3M | 317M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 2.2B | 246M | 893% |
CTOS | PLXS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTOS's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PLXS (50) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CTOS’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTOS (84) in the null industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTOS’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's SMR Rating (71) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTOS (90) in the null industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to CTOS’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTOS (57) in the null industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to CTOS’s over the last 12 months.
CTOS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PLXS (34) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CTOS’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.
| CTOS | PLXS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 76% | 25 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 67% |
CTOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTOS has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTOS jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTOS | 100% | -4.38% | ||
| ENVA - CTOS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| OMF - CTOS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| URI - CTOS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| AL - CTOS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SLM - CTOS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||
PLXS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLXS has been closely correlated with SANM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLXS jumps, then SANM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLXS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLXS | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| SANM - PLXS | 75% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| CTS - PLXS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| BHE - PLXS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| BELFB - PLXS | 68% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
| FLEX - PLXS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||